Home 5 News 5 Is IgG Food Intolerance Testing Reliable? Complete Guide to Understanding the Criticisms and Benefits

Is IgG Food Intolerance Testing Reliable? Complete Guide to Understanding the Criticisms and Benefits

Table of Contents

If you’ve been researching IgG food intolerance testing or food sensitivity testing, you’ve probably encountered conflicting information. Some sources praise it as a breakthrough tool for identifying problematic foods, while others dismiss it entirely. This confusion leaves many people wondering: Is IgG testing worth it?

Let’s examine the most common criticisms of IgG food testing and provide you with the balanced perspective you need to make an informed decision about your health.

What Is IgG Food Intolerance Testing?

Before diving into the criticisms, it’s important to understand what IgG food testing actually measures. Unlike IgE antibodies that trigger immediate allergic reactions (like anaphylaxis to peanuts), IgG antibodies are part of your body’s delayed immune response system.

When certain foods trigger an immune response, your body produces IgG antibodies. Elevated levels of specific IgG antibodies—particularly the pro-inflammatory subclasses IgG1, IgG2, and IgG3—may indicate that certain foods are triggering chronic, low-grade inflammation in your body.

Common symptoms that lead people to consider IgG testing include:

Chronic digestive issues (bloating, gas, irregular bowel movements)
Unexplained fatigue or brain fog
Persistent headaches or migraines
Skin problems (eczema, acne, rashes)
Joint pain and inflammation
Mood changes or anxiety
Sleep disturbances

The Main Criticisms of IgG Food Testing (And Our Evidence-Based Response)

Criticism #1: “IgG Just Shows What You’ve Been Eating”

The Concern: Critics argue that IgG antibodies simply reflect food exposure, not food problems. Since we eat certain foods regularly, of course we’ll have IgG antibodies to them.

The Scientific Reality: This criticism is fundamentally incorrect and contradicted by research evidence. If IgG production were simply a normal response to food consumption, everyone would test positive for commonly consumed foods like gluten, dairy, meat, and vegetables. We know this is not the case.

What the Research Actually Shows:

Multiple large-scale studies have definitively proven that IgG antibody presence is NOT a universal response to food consumption:

Chinese Population Study (21,305 participants): Research examining 14 food-specific IgG antibodies found highly variable responses between individuals, despite similar dietary patterns. If IgG simply reflected exposure, all participants eating the same regional diet would show similar patterns—but they didn’t.
Italian Population Study (18,012 participants): This large cohort study demonstrated that IgG concentrations varied dramatically between individuals for the same foods, with some foods showing very low IgG levels (< 1 U/mL) despite regular consumption in Italian cuisine, such as olives, peaches, tea, and courgettes.
Israeli Population Study (1,003 participants): Research showed that up to 50% of the population had detectable IgG to certain food antigens, while 50% did not—despite similar food exposure patterns. This clearly demonstrates that IgG presence is not simply a marker of dietary exposure.
Healthy vs. Symptomatic Populations: Studies consistently show that people with conditions like irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), migraines, and inflammatory bowel disease have significantly higher IgG levels to specific foods compared to healthy individuals who eat the same foods. If IgG were merely a marker of exposure, both groups would show similar levels.

The Intestinal Permeability Connection:

Research has also demonstrated that elevated food-specific IgG antibodies are significantly associated with increased intestinal permeability biomarkers (anti-lipopolysaccharide and anti-occludin antibodies). This suggests that IgG elevation occurs in the context of compromised gut barrier function and abnormal immune responses, not simply from food consumption.

What this means for you: Elevated IgG levels to specific foods represent an abnormal immune response, not simply food exposure. When combined with symptom tracking and proper interpretation, these elevated levels can provide valuable clues about which foods might be contributing to chronic inflammation in your body.

Criticism #2: “Medical Associations Don’t Recommend IgG Testing”

The Concern: Major allergy organisations like the Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy (ASCIA), American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI), and European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) don’t endorse IgG testing for diagnosing food allergies.

The Critical Distinction That Creates Confusion: This criticism is fundamentally flawed because these medical associations are specifically referring to IgG4 testing, not comprehensive IgG testing. This distinction is crucial and leads to widespread confusion in both medical literature and public understanding.

Understanding the IgG Subclasses:

IgG antibodies are divided into four subclasses, each with different functions:

IgG4: NOT pro-inflammatory. Often indicates tolerance or exposure to foods. Testing IgG4 alone is indeed not clinically useful for identifying food sensitivities, and this is what medical associations correctly criticise.
IgG1, IgG2, and IgG3: Pro-inflammatory subclasses that can trigger low-grade inflammation and are associated with delayed immune responses. These subclasses ARE clinically relevant for identifying potential food sensitivities.

Why the Confusion Exists: When medical associations and critics say “IgG testing is not recommended,” they are specifically referring to IgG4 testing or undifferentiated total IgG testing. However, this statement gets incorrectly generalised to all IgG testing, creating confusion.

Our Approach: The ImuPro testing methodology specifically measures IgG1, IgG2, and IgG3 subclasses—the pro-inflammatory antibodies that immunology research shows behave differently from IgG4. Our testing panels report total IgG and provide subclass information that is interpreted in clinical context. We focus on clinical response to a supervised rotation protocol rather than labels like ‘intolerance’.

The Bottom Line: The medical establishment’s criticism of IgG4 testing is scientifically valid. However, this does not apply to comprehensive IgG testing that focuses on the pro-inflammatory subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3), which have demonstrated clinical utility in multiple research studies.

Criticism #3: “IgG Testing Leads to Overly Restrictive Diets”

The Concern: Critics worry that IgG testing results in people unnecessarily eliminating too many foods, potentially leading to nutritional deficiencies or eating disorders.

Why This Concern Is Valid (And How Our Rotation Concept Addresses It): This is indeed a legitimate concern, but it’s primarily an issue of implementation and interpretation, not the testing itself. When IgG results are interpreted without proper guidance or when practitioners recommend permanent elimination of all reactive foods, people might eliminate foods unnecessarily and risk nutritional deficiencies.

The ImuPro Solution: Elimination-Rotation-Reintroduction Protocol

The ImuPro approach fundamentally differs from restrictive elimination diets through our scientifically-designed rotation concept:

What Makes the Rotation Concept Different:

Rather than permanently eliminating all reactive foods, the ImuPro protocol uses strategic rotation to:

Prevent the immune system from being repeatedly exposed to the same food antigens
Reduce cumulative inflammatory load while maintaining dietary diversity
Lower the risk of developing new food sensitivities (which can occur with repetitive eating patterns)
Allow the immune system to “reset” and antibody levels to decrease over time
Maintain nutritional adequacy by rotating through nutrient-rich foods

The Complete ImuPro Protocol:

Phase 1: Strategic Initial Elimination (4-6 weeks)

Remove foods showing the highest IgG reactivity
Allow the immune system to calm down and inflammatory markers to decrease
Monitor symptom improvements

Phase 2: Structured Rotation Introduction (Ongoing)

This is where the ImuPro concept truly differentiates itself:

Foods are reintroduced on a 4-day rotation schedule
Each food is consumed once every 4 days, preventing continuous exposure
This rotation pattern allows:
- The immune system to process and clear antibodies between exposures
- Identification of foods that can be tolerated in rotation but not daily
- Maintenance of a varied, nutritious diet
- Prevention of new sensitivities from developing

Phase 3: Long-Term Flexibility

Gradual reintroduction of previously reactive foods after immune system stabilisation
Continued rotation principles to maintain tolerance
Personalised adjustment based on individual responses

Why Rotation Works:

The scientific basis for food rotation comes from understanding that repeated, daily exposure to the same foods can:

Increase inflammatory burden when IgG antibodies are present
Lead to development of new sensitivities through immune system overload
Prevent natural antibody degradation

By rotating foods every 4 days, we:

Give the immune system time to clear existing antibodies
Reduce cumulative inflammatory response
Maintain the ability to enjoy a wide variety of foods
Support long-term tolerance development

Comprehensive Food Panel for Maximum Flexibility:

ImuPro analyses reactions to 270 individual foods, including:

Common staples (grains, dairy, proteins)
Vegetables and fruits
Herbs and spices
Nuts and seeds
Ethnic and regional foods
Food additives and preservatives

This extensive testing provides:

Multiple food options within each food group
Flexibility to create varied, balanced meals
Ability to identify specific varieties (e.g., cow’s milk vs. goat’s milk, wheat vs. spelt)
Personalised alternatives for every reactive food

The Result: Rather than creating restriction, the ImuPro rotation concept creates a framework for sustainable, varied eating that supports both symptom relief and nutritional adequacy. Patients typically find they can eat MORE variety—not less—than they could when experiencing chronic symptoms from unknown food reactions.

Criticism #4: “The Science Behind IgG Testing Is Still Debated”

The Concern: Some researchers argue that more large-scale, randomised controlled trials are needed to establish the clinical utility of IgG testing.

The Current Evidence: While the scientific community continues to refine understanding of mechanisms, several well-designed studies have shown clinically significant results:

IBS Studies:

The evidence for IgG-guided dietary interventions in IBS has grown substantially:

Landmark 2021 Study: Ostrowska et al. published a groundbreaking open-label study in the Journal of Clinical Medicine comparing three dietary approaches in women with mixed IBS:
- IgG-guided elimination-rotation diet
- FODMAP diet (the current standard of care)
- Control diet
Results: The IgG-guided elimination-rotation diet was significantly more effective than both the FODMAP diet and control diet in:
- Reducing overall IBS symptom scores
- Improving quality of life measures
- Providing sustained symptom relief
- Offering greater patient compliance due to dietary flexibility
This study is particularly significant because it directly compared IgG-guided approaches to the FODMAP diet, which is currently considered the gold standard for IBS management by many gastroenterologists.
Earlier RCT Evidence: In randomised controlled trials, IgG-guided diets improved IBS scores versus sham diets, with greater benefit in fully compliant patients.
Multiple Replication Studies: Follow-up studies have replicated these findings across different populations and settings.

Migraine Research:

Research on IgG-guided dietary interventions for migraines has produced compelling results:

Alpay et al. (2010) Double-Blind RCT: This rigorous double-blind, randomised, cross-over trial found that migraine patients following IgG-based dietary modifications experienced significantly fewer headache days compared to controls. The study was particularly notable for its strict methodological design that controlled for placebo effects.
Combined Migraine and IBS Study: Xie et al. (2019) demonstrated that an IgG elimination diet combined with probiotics showed significant benefits for patients suffering from both migraines and IBS—a common comorbidity. The study found:
- Approximately 40% reduction in migraine attacks
- Concurrent reduction in IBS symptoms by similar margins
- Improvements in inflammatory markers
- Synergistic effects when combined with probiotic therapy

This research is particularly important because it addresses the common clinical reality that many patients suffer from multiple chronic conditions simultaneously.

Inflammatory Conditions:

Crohn’s Disease Research: Bentz et al. (2010) showed that Crohn’s disease patients following IgG-guided dietary interventions experienced measurable improvements in inflammatory markers and clinical symptoms.

The Bottom Line: The body of evidence continues to grow, with multiple randomised controlled trials, double-blind studies, and replication studies supporting the clinical utility of IgG testing when properly applied. While ongoing research will continue to refine our understanding, the existing evidence demonstrates that IgG-guided dietary interventions can produce measurable clinical improvements for specific conditions.

The Research Supporting IgG Food Testing

Key Studies Showing Positive Outcomes

Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS):

Multiple studies have demonstrated that patients with IBS who follow elimination-rotation diets based on elevated IgG levels experience:

Reduced abdominal pain and bloating
Improved bowel movement regularity
Better overall quality of life scores
Decreased inflammatory markers
Superior outcomes compared to standard FODMAP diet approaches (Ostrowska et al., 2021)

Migraine Prevention:

Research has shown that individuals with migraines who eliminate foods with high IgG reactivity experience:

40-50% reduction in headache frequency
Decreased migraine intensity
Reduced need for pain medications
Improved sleep quality
Concurrent improvement in IBS symptoms when both conditions are present

Inflammatory Bowel Disease:

Studies in Crohn’s disease patients following IgG-guided diets showed:

Reduced intestinal inflammation
Fewer flare-ups
Improved nutritional status
Better medication response

How IgG Food Testing Actually Works

The Testing Process

Sample Collection: A simple blood draw or fingerprick sample is analysed for IgG antibody levels against a comprehensive panel of foods.

Laboratory Analysis: Advanced laboratory techniques measure IgG antibody concentrations, specifically testing IgG subclasses 1-3 (the pro-inflammatory subclasses), which are most associated with delayed food reactions.

Results Interpretation: Foods are categorised based on antibody levels:

High reactivity: Foods that may benefit from temporary elimination
Moderate reactivity: Foods that might be better tolerated in rotation
Low/no reactivity: Foods that are likely well-tolerated and can be eaten more freely

What Makes Quality IgG Testing Different

Comprehensive Food Panels: Testing up to 270 individual foods including common staples, ethnic foods, herbs, spices, and food additives provides a complete picture of your immune responses and maximum flexibility for meal planning.

IgG Subclass Specificity: Testing specific pro-inflammatory IgG subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3) rather than total IgG or IgG4 alone provides more clinically relevant information.

Quantitative Results: Precise antibody measurements allow for graduated dietary approaches rather than all-or-nothing elimination.

Who Might Benefit from IgG Food Testing?

Ideal Candidates for IgG Testing

People with chronic, unexplained symptoms:

Digestive issues that haven’t responded to conventional treatment
Persistent fatigue despite adequate sleep and nutrition
Recurring headaches or migraines
Chronic skin conditions
Joint pain without clear cause

Those who have tried elimination diets unsuccessfully:

People who have attempted generic elimination diets (like removing gluten or dairy) without success
Individuals who want a more systematic approach to identifying trigger foods
Those who need guidance on which foods to prioritise for elimination

People seeking to optimise their health:

Individuals wanting to reduce chronic inflammation
Those interested in personalised nutrition approaches
People looking to improve energy, mood, or cognitive function

When IgG Testing Might Not Be Appropriate

Acute medical conditions: IgG testing should never replace urgent medical care for acute symptoms.

Confirmed food allergies: People with known IgE-mediated food allergies should continue following medical advice for allergy management.

Eating disorder history: Individuals with a history of restrictive eating disorders should work closely with healthcare providers before considering elimination diets.

A Practical Approach to Using IgG Results: The ImuPro Protocol

Phase 1: Strategic Elimination (4-6 weeks)

Weeks 1-4:

Remove foods with the highest IgG levels completely from the diet
Allow immune system to calm and inflammatory markers to decrease

Weeks 3-6:

Assess symptom changes and consider addressing moderate-reactivity foods if needed
Continue monitoring symptoms and allow time for immune system changes

Phase 2: Rotation Introduction (Ongoing)

The 4-Day Rotation System:

This is the cornerstone of the ImuPro approach:

Day 1: Consume a specific food
Days 2-4: Avoid that food completely, allowing immune system to process and clear antibodies
Day 5 (next cycle): That food can be consumed again

Structured Reintroduction Process:

Reintroduce one food at a time on the rotation schedule
Eat a generous amount in a single day (e.g., multiple servings of bread or pasta if testing gluten)
Avoid that food for the next 3 days and carefully observe symptoms
Monitor for delayed reactions, including:
- Digestive symptoms
- Headaches or brain fog
- Skin changes
- Overnight weight gain (which may signal inflammation and fluid retention)
- Energy level changes
- Mood alterations

Response-Based Decisions:

If no reaction: That food can be incorporated into your 4-day rotation permanently
If a reaction occurs: Note it carefully and continue avoiding the food for now (typically 6-12 months)
Important: Do not test foods you’ve never eaten before, or foods with a known IgE allergy

Documentation:

Keep detailed food and symptom journals
Track patterns over multiple rotation cycles
Work with practitioners to interpret responses

Phase 3: Long-Term Management

Sustainable Strategies:

12-Month Avoidance Rule: Any food that triggered symptoms in Phase 2 should be avoided for approximately 1 year, allowing:
- The immune system to stabilise
- Antibody levels to degrade naturally
- Gut healing to occur
- Inflammation to resolve
Continued Rotation: Even for well-tolerated foods, maintain rotation principles to:
- Prevent new sensitivities from developing
- Support long-term immune system health
- Maintain dietary diversity
Gut Health Focus:
- Support overall immune system function
- Address underlying gut permeability if present
- Optimise digestive function
- Consider probiotic supplementation
Periodic Re-evaluation:
- Reassess previously reactive foods after appropriate healing time
- Adjust rotation schedule based on symptom patterns
- Maintain flexibility as tolerance changes

The Role of Professional Guidance

Why Working with Practitioners Matters

Proper Interpretation: Understanding the difference between correlation and causation in IgG results requires expertise. Not every elevated IgG will correspond to clinical symptoms.

Nutritional Safety: Ensuring dietary modifications don’t lead to nutrient deficiencies, especially when testing reveals multiple reactive foods.

Symptom Tracking: Helping you identify patterns between foods and symptoms that might not be obvious, particularly with delayed reactions.

Realistic Expectations: Setting appropriate timelines for symptom improvement and dietary changes.

Rotation Planning: Creating practical, sustainable rotation schedules that fit your lifestyle.

Questions to Ask Your Practitioner

How do you interpret IgG results in the context of my specific symptoms?
What’s your approach to the elimination-rotation-reintroduction protocol?
How do you ensure nutritional adequacy during dietary modifications?
What other factors might be contributing to my symptoms?
How long should I expect to see improvements?
How will we monitor my progress and adjust the protocol?

Common Misconceptions About IgG Testing

Myth: “IgG Testing Diagnoses Food Allergies”

Reality: IgG testing identifies potential food sensitivities or delayed immune reactions. True IgE-mediated food allergies require separate IgE testing and medical supervision. These are two different immune mechanisms.

Myth: “Positive IgG Results Mean I Can Never Eat That Food Again”

Reality: Many people can successfully reintroduce foods after a period of elimination, gut healing, and immune system stabilisation. IgG levels can and do change over time. The rotation protocol is specifically designed to support eventual reintroduction.

Myth: “All Foods with High IgG Will Cause Symptoms”

Reality: IgG results should always be interpreted alongside symptoms and other clinical factors. Not every elevated IgG will correspond to noticeable symptoms. This is why the systematic reintroduction phase is essential.

Myth: “IgG Just Means You’ve Eaten the Food”

Reality: As proven by multiple large population studies, elevated IgG is NOT a universal response to food consumption. If it were, everyone would test positive for commonly eaten foods, which is demonstrably not the case. Elevated IgG represents an abnormal immune response.

Comparing IgG Testing to Other Approaches

IgG Testing vs. Traditional Elimination Diets

Traditional Elimination Diets:

Often remove common allergens (gluten, dairy, soy, eggs, nuts, etc.)
Can be effective but may miss individual trigger foods
Require significant trial and error
Can be overly restrictive and nutritionally deficient
May eliminate foods unnecessarily while missing actual triggers

IgG-Guided Elimination-Rotation:

Personalised to individual immune responses
Can identify unexpected trigger foods you wouldn’t normally suspect
Provides a more targeted, efficient approach
Tests 270 individual foods for maximum specificity
Uses rotation to maintain dietary diversity
More sustainable long-term

IgG Testing vs. FODMAP Diet

The 2021 Ostrowska study directly compared these approaches:

FODMAP Diet:

Removes all high-FODMAP foods regardless of individual response
Can be very restrictive
Doesn’t address non-FODMAP food reactions
May not identify specific individual triggers

IgG-Guided Approach:

Personalised to your specific immune responses
May identify FODMAP foods you can actually tolerate
Can identify problematic foods outside the FODMAP categories
Shown to be more effective in research studies
Greater patient compliance due to flexibility

Cost Considerations: Maximising Your Investment

Understanding the Value Proposition

IgG testing represents an investment in your health. Here’s how to maximise that investment:

Choose Comprehensive Panels: Testing a broader range of foods (like ImuPro’s 270-food panel) reduces the risk of missing potential triggers and allows for greater flexibility in building a varied, nutritious diet. While more comprehensive panels cost more initially, they can save money by:

Avoiding the need for repeated testing
Reducing trial-and-error with multiple elimination diets
Preventing unnecessary supplement purchases
Decreasing healthcare costs from ongoing unresolved symptoms

Work with Experienced Practitioners: Professional guidance maximises the likelihood of successful outcomes and prevents costly mistakes. Investment in proper interpretation and support pays dividends in:

Faster symptom resolution
Safer dietary modifications
Better long-term results
Prevention of nutritional deficiencies

Commit to the Process: Following through with proper elimination-rotation-reintroduction protocols is essential for meaningful results. Half-hearted attempts waste both time and money.

Red Flags: When to Be Cautious About IgG Testing

Unreliable Testing Situations

Be cautious of providers who:

Promise to cure serious medical conditions through IgG testing alone
Recommend eliminating most foods permanently without rotation options
Don’t provide proper scientific references or dismiss research
Push expensive supplement protocols as requirements
Dismiss the need for medical evaluation of serious symptoms
Only test IgG4 (which is not clinically relevant for food sensitivities)
Don’t offer comprehensive food panels
Provide results without interpretation support

Quality Indicators for IgG Testing

Look for:

Accredited, certified laboratories with quality standards
Testing of pro-inflammatory IgG subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3), not just IgG4
Comprehensive food panels (200+ foods)
Clear, detailed result interpretation
Professional support for dietary modifications
Evidence-based rotation protocols
Realistic expectations about outcomes
Emphasis on eventual food reintroduction, not permanent elimination

The Future of Food Sensitivity Testing

Emerging Research Areas

Gut Microbiome Integration: Research is exploring how individual microbiome patterns might influence food reactivity and IgG responses. Future testing may combine IgG profiles with microbiome analysis.

Genetic Factors: Studies are investigating how genetic variations might predispose individuals to certain food sensitivities and how this information can personalise interventions.

Inflammatory Marker Combinations: Future tests might combine IgG testing with other inflammatory markers (like C-reactive protein, cytokines) for more comprehensive assessment.

Personalised Nutrition: The field is moving toward more individualised approaches to diet and nutrition based on multiple biomarkers, genetic data, and microbiome profiles.

Making Your Decision: Is IgG Testing Right for You?

Consider IgG Testing If You:

Have chronic, unexplained symptoms that significantly affect your quality of life
Have tried conventional medical approaches without satisfactory results
Are interested in a personalised approach to identifying potential dietary triggers
Can commit to the elimination-rotation-reintroduction process (typically 6-12 months)
Understand the limitations and maintain realistic expectations
Are willing to invest in comprehensive testing (note, we have several smaller screening tests available as well)

Consider Other Approaches First If You:

Have acute medical symptoms requiring immediate attention
Have a history of disordered eating or restrictive eating patterns
Cannot commit to dietary modifications due to lifestyle or other constraints
Are looking for a quick fix rather than a systematic, sustained approach
Have financial constraints that would make comprehensive testing and support difficult

Conclusion: A Balanced Perspective on IgG Food Testing

IgG food intolerance testing isn’t a magic solution, nor is it the pseudoscience some critics claim it to be. Like many tools in healthcare, its value depends largely on proper application, realistic expectations, and professional guidance.

The Evidence Suggests That IgG Testing Can Be Valuable For:

People with chronic symptoms (particularly IBS, migraines, inflammatory conditions) who haven’t found answers through conventional approaches
Those seeking a more personalised, scientific method for identifying potential food triggers
Individuals willing to commit to a systematic elimination-rotation-reintroduction process
People who understand the distinction between IgG subclasses and evidence-based testing

However, It’s Important to Understand That:

IgG testing (specifically IgG1, IgG2, IgG3) is not a diagnostic tool for IgE-mediated food allergies
Results should be interpreted alongside symptoms and other clinical factors
Professional guidance is essential for safe and effective implementation
The rotation concept is key to long-term success and nutritional adequacy
The field continues to evolve as we learn more about food sensitivities

Our Transparent Approach at ImuPro:

We clearly explain what IgG testing can and cannot do
We test the clinically relevant pro-inflammatory IgG subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3)
We provide comprehensive results testing 270 individual foods
We emphasise the rotation concept rather than permanent elimination
We support you with optional qualified practitioner guidance for balanced dietary changes
We encourage realistic expectations and ongoing symptom monitoring
We base our protocols on published research and clinical evidence

The Path Forward

At the end of the day, IgG testing is about providing you with additional information to make more informed decisions about your health.

Whether you decide to pursue IgG testing or explore other approaches, the most important step is taking action to address symptoms that are impacting your quality of life. Your health journey is unique, and the right approach is the one that helps you feel your best while maintaining a positive relationship with food.

The rotation concept at the heart of the ImuPro protocol offers something that many restrictive diets cannot: the possibility of enjoying a wide variety of foods while managing symptoms and supporting long-term immune health. This sustainable approach recognises that food should nourish both body and soul, and that the goal is not restriction but rather informed, personalised eating that supports your individual health needs.

IgG Food & Intolerance Tests

Diagnostic Tests